Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream pending * Leo Iannacone <l...@ubuntu.com> [2014-04-14 00:20:53 +0200]:
> Dear Maintainer, > > your package seems to be packaged over pip. > > You should consider to repack it according with real > upstream source. Hi, It's a best practice to use whatever upstream provides as a release, and to avoid gratuitous repackagings. AFAICS, the new upstream release contains most of the stuff that was missing previously, I'll close that bug when I'll have uploaded the new version. > Moreover binary package python-websocket should be > renamed to python-websocket-client according with > source name. No. The Debian Python policy (section 2.2, "Module Package Names")[1] states that binary packages must be named after the importable module packaged within. The import statement is "import websocket", therefore the binary package name is right. I chose the source package name to match the upstream name. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-package_names Thanks for your report, -- Nicolas Dandrimont BOFH excuse #13: we're waiting for [the phone company] to fix that line
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
