Hi, On Mittwoch, 30. April 2014, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > I'll try to cook something. But if you really want to remove the > support, wouldn't it be better to unconditionally switch to the new > path instead?
as said a year ago, just changing pathes won't work, as detecting selinux
needs to be updated too:
On Samstag, 18. Mai 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> tags 682068 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi Laurent,
>
> piuparts is only trying to mount selinux mountpoints if
> /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled ran successfully.
>
> I have two problems now:
> - /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled doesn't even exist on my wheezy system
> - isn't there some selinux tool to tell me the expected mountpoint? I don't
> want to mess around with versions in piuparts.py source code (be it
> "wheezy", "squeeze", 2.0.96-1 or 2.1.9-5) to decide whether to mount
> /selinux or /sys/fs/selinux ?!!
>
> See below for actual related code. That's it, plus calls to them.
>
> def selinux_enabled(enabled_test="/usr/sbin/selinuxenabled"):
> if os.access(enabled_test, os.X_OK):
> retval, output = run([enabled_test], ignore_errors=True)
> if retval == 0:
> return True
> else:
> return False
>
> def mount_selinux(self):
> if selinux_enabled():
> run(["mkdir", "-p", self.relative("/selinux")])
> run(["mount", "-t", "selinuxfs", "/selinux",
> self.relative("/selinux")])
> logging.info("SElinux mounted into chroot")
>
> def unmount_selinux(self):
> if selinux_enabled():
> run(["umount", self.relative("/selinux")])
> logging.info("SElinux unmounted from chroot")
I think I really either want a tested patch from someone using selinux or
remove this code.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
