Hi, It does seem a whole lot like libdm should be creating a control device that has the same ownership and permissions as other block devices (a quick scan over the ones on my udev-using systems show all block devices in /sys/block that have corresponding entries in /dev have the permissions that bdale described, with the obvious exception of the dm-* devices). Bastian, we should be following convention (even if policy doesn't explicitly describe it) unless there's a good reason not to.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
