On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:00:44AM +0200, Stefano Karapetsas wrote:
> >I think mate-power-manager should simply depend on
> >mate-notification-daemon, or is there a good reason not to?
> No, depend on libnotify is enough
Well, apparently not, as it was broken for me. Now I see that
mate-power-manager depends on notification-daemon as an alternative to
mate-notification-daemon - so it seems...
> >but not mate-notification-daemon. I have GNOME's
> >notification-daemon installed (0.7.6-1) but it wasn't running in a
> >mate desktop session.
> Notification daemons arent running every time, they are just started
> by dbus when needed
...the problem is notification-daemon is not handling notifications
of mate-power-manager (only mate-notification-daemon is), and instead
a weird fallback happens.
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
