Le Mon, 12 May 2014 11:49:42 +0200, Karel Zak <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 02:14:34PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > After looking at Fedora/CentOS ssh pam config file and talking with > > people upstream[0] I think that the call to pam_selinux open should > > be moved higher in the session stack (just after pam_loginuid and > > before pam_keyinit to follow what Fedora is doing). > > just for curiosity, why do you still use ligin(1) from shadow-utils? > Does it have any feature that is missing in util-linux login(1)? > > Note that we spent a lot time to make util-linux login(1) compatible > with Suse, /etc/login.defs and to make it PAM-only etc. I've the same question for su actually, but I guess this is a bit out of the scope of this bugreport. Cheers! Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
