On Sun, 2014-05-18 at 11:37:25 +0200, Ralf Jung wrote: > > Hmm, bother. When I added the --warning=none, I checked the tar source > > code to see if such warnings would be silenced but it, and it seemed > > so, I guess I either missed some codepaths or missread some of the > > code. In any case I'll just send stderr to /dev/null for 1.17.10. > > This is only the second time I get such mail, so if you did not change > the script, maybe tar changed?
Nah, the --warning=none and the alternatives backup was only added very recently. But in any case I think tar should honor its own options, so I'll be filing a bug against it, regardless of ignoring its output for now in this case. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
