On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:40:48PM +0000, Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Ralf Neubauer may or may not have written... > > Yes, I really want to use ALSA as well.. The driver is part of the kernel, > > so do I file a bug against linux-image-2.6.12-286-1 in the BTS? > > I would say so (and file the bug number here for reference).
#340108 (upgraded to and retested with linux-image-2.6.14-2-386) > > This looks like the debian way. Or do I have to get an account on > > https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/ just for filing this bug??? Hmm, you > > can't answer this, I suppose, just thinking in public.. > > It may be worth mentioning there too, but before you do, I think that you > should at least check kernel 2.6.14.<latest> and possibly an ALSA development > snapshot. Or look at alsa/alsa-kernel/isa/sb/sb*.c before. The last real bug fix is from 20 months ago, but there is heavy development going on in fitting the driver to new alsa and kernel interfaces.. +204 -123 lines 3 days ago... Just reorganisation, no change in what happens in the end, I suppose. Ok, they will want to know the code did not catch more errors in the process... Ralf -- 00000000 72 61 6c 66 40 73 74 72 : 63 6d 70 2e 64 65 0a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
