On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:56:16AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Le 21 mai 2014 20:57, "Aurelien Jarno" <aure...@debian.org> a écrit : > > > > Package: lintian > > Version: 2.5.22.1 > > Severity: normal > > > > lintian contains a few whitelisted errors when the source package is > > eglibc. Now that the upstream glibc development is more friendly and > > that eglibc is stopping being developed, we are in the process of > > switching back to the upstream glibc. We'll rename the source package > > with it, which gives us some additional lintian errors and warnings, > > some of them triggering an automated reject by ftpmasters: > > > > E: libc6: embedded-library lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm-2.19.so: libm > > W: libc6: non-multi-arch-lib-dir lib64/ > > E: libc6-i386: embedded-library lib32/libm-2.19.so: libm > > W: libc6-i386: non-multi-arch-lib-dir lib32/ > > W: libc6-i386: non-multi-arch-lib-dir usr/lib32/ > > W: libc6-dev-x32: non-multi-arch-lib-dir usr/libx32/ > > W: libc6-dev-i386: non-multi-arch-lib-dir usr/lib32/ > > E: libc6-x32: embedded-library libx32/libm-2.19.so: libm > > W: libc6-x32: non-multi-arch-lib-dir libx32/ > > W: libc6-x32: non-multi-arch-lib-dir usr/libx32/ > > E: libc6-udeb udeb: embedded-library lib/libm-2.19.so: libm > > > > Could you please therefore extent the eglibc whitelist to also cover the > > glibc source package? Thanks in advance. > > What is the eta?
We plan to do first a eglibc 2.18 -> eglibc 2.19 transition, we need to ask a transition slot for that, so we don't fully control the timing for that. Then we'll do the transition eglibc 2.19 -> glibc 2.19. It's therefore difficult to give you and exact estimate, but let's say we plan to upload it in about 3-4 weeks. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
