On jeu., 2014-06-05 at 11:00 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > > I'm ok for that, but if someone could actually provide a > working/tested > > profile it'd help. I'd rather not upload that stuff twice or thrice > just > > to pass one error at a time… > > It's unclear to me what "working/tested" means in this context, if > Daniel Richard G.'s assertion that the lightdm guest session does not > exist on Debian. Do you mean a patched profile that parses right, even > if it's entirely useless?
Well, as said before, I don't use AppArmor neither the guest session so it's a bit hard to know how to fix that properly. It'd help if the original reporter could state its expectations. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
