On 9 June 2014 14:33, Dimitri John Ledkov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9 June 2014 00:16, Peter Michael Green <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> No need, I maintain boost in ubuntu, and was aware of the issue, but
> didn't have time to dig into which gcc upload regressed on this. Since
> there is no code changes in boost that would have caused boost arm64
> FTBFS on ubuntu.
>

Actually, I think I couldn't reproduce it on a porter box, as it had a
newer kernel and everything worked just fine.
As a point of interest, which hardware/emulator was your build running
on and with which kernel?

-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to