Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: severity -1 serious On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:44:50PM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: > I'm a bit unclear as to what you are saying is wrong with the package. > If this is still an issue today, could you elaborate?
What Otavio was saying when he stated "Wrong shlibs information" is that the information provided in util-linux packaging file "debian/libblkid1.shlibs" is incorrect. Please compare this information against the information provided in "debian/libblkid1.symbols" where several symbols are marked as being available in > 2.17 only. (And note that udebs do not make use of symbols files, only shlibs.) Please also see the information provided about this in the Debian Policy document. A very relevant chapter is: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-depends (But there are also additional revelant information in other chapters.) I'm not sure if this causes any grave issues anymore, so I'm "just" raising the severity to serious because of the policy violation. The fix should be trivial. Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
