Am Friday, den 20.06.2014, 18:40 +0200 schrieb Agustin Martin: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:09:38PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > > On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 18:13 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > > > 2014-05-19 22:00 GMT+02:00 Tobias Frost <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > I reuploaded the current state to mentors; It should be here: > > > > > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-it/aspell-it_2.4-20070901-0-2.1.dsc > > > > (Of course the binary on mentors is currently built against > > > > dictionaries-common-dev 1.23.2, so it will need a rebuild anyway as soon > > > > as 1.23.3 is in the archives.) > > > > I've just uploaded a new version of the example package to mentors > > (location's the same). > > Changes are the suggested ones above: B-D only on unversioned aspell, > > s/Vcs-git/Vcs-Git, removing aspell dependency in binary package. > > Hi, and sorry for the delay. > > Noticed that it is tagged as not needing a sponsor. Do you want to have it > there just as reference?
The upload was indeed thought as a reference to finish discussion here and eventually upload it after we agree that this could be used as reference for all the other dictionaries benefiting from dh_aspell-simple. So, if you think its ready, then let's go. Its better to have it in the archives then to suddenly have it disappear on mentors. Guiseppe, aspell-it's maintainer is in CC since May 16, but unfortunately there was no response from him, so we should follow a normal NMU procedure, maybe with maximum delay Yes, it currently looks like that I'll need a sponsor, as my usual sponsor is currently on VAC and I have no idea when DAM will finally approve my NM process. > > I think I've already collected this information. (However, this might be > > inaccurate in details as the context was a little different when I > > assembled this information. The focus was at that time if it has the > > hashfile symlinked. ) > > > > Then likely those packages would benefit from dh_aspell-simple: > ... > > aspell-en > > I have been using it in my tests. Can provide a patch if needed. > > > aspell-tl > > This one is mine. It also creates myspell-tl, so it will not have the big > benefit other packages can get from aspell-simple. I do not think it worths > the effort. > On the other hand, I already sent the info to Dict-common-dev list, > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/dict-common-dev/2014-June/000789.html > > I got no reply, but only few maintainers are subscribed. Do you think it would make sense to send it also to debian-devel? As with this new features increases also the packages quality (e.g piuparts) it might also make sense to discuss a mass bug-filing on -devel as a next step and eventually also going into NMUing if there are responses. What do you think? -- Tobi > Regards, > > -- > Agustin >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
