On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:18:13 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Fine by me, but that allows for perl 5.16 and lower, which have M::B < > > 0.40. If that's not a concern, just drop the versioned part and use > > plain libmodule-build-perl? > Right. If that's a concern (it is to me, but some consider backporting > irrelevant to support, and some favor automated dependency handling over > most accurate declaration), then repeat with the lower limitation as > well, but with the satisfiable-in-current-unstable listed first in both > cases, like this: > > Build-Depends: libmodule-build-perl (>= 0.40) | perl (<< 5.19), > libmodule-build-perl (>= 0.40) | perl (>= 5.17.1)
/me has a déjà-vu -- didn't we have this already some days ago? Found it: the subthread starting at https://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2014/06/msg00009.html Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: The Eagles: I Can't Tell You Why
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
