Yaroslav Halchenko <y...@debian.org> wrote: > are you sure Jay? ;) > > From the beginning it had build-depends on > > libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev > > So I do not think there should be really a problem building it and at > best this issue is of normal severity to swap those bdepends order. Or am I > wrong? > > I see that libtiff4-dev is still in sid so we can't even 'check' to be 100% > sure that anything gets broken, right? (buildd's environments iirc might > indeed > puke requiring first one to be the present one)
Yeah, I think that should be fine. Sorry about that -- my script to find all affected packages just looked for build dependencies on libtiff4-dev. I didn't think to filter out the case where it was an alternative with libtiff-dev or libtiff5-dev. Feel free to just close the bugs. If I get some time, I may go through the remaining 24 open bugs and see if others are like that as well. Thanks. -- Jay Berkenbilt <q...@debian.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
