Hi, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > On 01/07/14 14:24, Guo Yixuan wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org > > > wrote: > >> > >> On 29/06/14 19:31, Guo Yixuan wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> > > wrote: > >>>> On 2014-06-29 05:34, Guo Yixuan (郭溢譞) wrote: > >>>>> Package: release.debian.org > >>>>> Severity: normal > >>>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > >>>>> Usertags: transition > >>>>> > >>>>> Dear Release Team, > >>>>> > >>>>> We're planning to upload a new version of librime, which has ABI/API > >>>>> breaks. The affected packages are few, and all under IME team's > >>>>> maintenance, and we're mostly ready to have sourceful upload for > >>>>> these packages: > >>>>> > >>>>> Source: fcitx-rime > >>>>> Source: ibus-rime > >>>>> > >>>>> Ben file: > >>>>> > >>>>> [...] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Could you please upload the new version of librime to experimental? > >>>> This should automatically generate a simple tracker for your (called > >>>> auto-librime). > >>>> > >>>> ~Niels > >>> > >>> Osamu just helped to upload it (to unstable), so it's now in the new > >>> queue. [1] > >> > >> Please next time upload to experimental when you're asked to do so. In > > this case > >> it's fine, I verified that there are no conflicts with other transitions, > > so > >> there's no need to cancel the upload. > > > > Thank you! > > > >> Why did you rename the -dev package from librime-dev to librime1-dev? > > Having an > >> unversioned -dev package (e.g. librime-dev) is generally preferred. A > > versioned > >> one makes sense when there are two versions of the library > > simultaneously, but > >> that is not the case here. > > > > The renaming is due to a backward-incompatible API change in > > librime 1.0, where some struct members changed types. So I > > followed the recommendation here.[1] > > > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPractices > > That advice is wrong. Renaming the -dev package makes sense if you're going to > keep the two versions of the library for a while, e.g. libgtk2.0-dev and > libgtk-3-dev, which usually means you renamed the source package (gtk+2.0 and > gtk+3.0 in my example). In your case, you want to keep the same librime-dev > package name. Can you change it back? > > I will review and edit that wiki page, thanks for the link. > > Regards, > Emilio
I just reverted it in git. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ime/librime.git;a=commitdiff;h=7551e2ee37f2b9a1ab8f1c4128c161c6d2ac11c3;hp=6f97e02e82a5854f829c83162ec69dfb66398c93 @Osamu, could you help me to upload it? Thank you! Regards, Yixuan