Hi Andreas, On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 19:16:52 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-07-03 Atsuhito Kohda <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] >> But then I'm afraid libgnutls-dev should depends on >> libgnutls28-dev. >> I believe dependency on libgnutls-dev is much reasonable >> than dependency on libgnutls28-dev. > > Yes, the current state is a little bit ugly, but could not be helped, > due incompatiblities. Okay. >> And I find that the new package seems to fix also #752610. >> Is this correct? > > It might make reproducing the bug against the test-site irreproducible > but there is a real bug in lynx that needs fixing. lynx does not do > certification verification properly as it only fails if > GNUTLS_CERT_SIGNER_NOT_FOUND is set. I guessed so but I'd like to confirm it. Thanks for your clarification. Best regards, 2014-7-4(Fri) -- Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
