On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 05:32:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> could you please quote the full upstream mail about the GDCM/ITK issue?
Sure:
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 23:28:02 +0200
> From: Carlos Barrales Ruiz <[email protected]>
> To: Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: assert() failed
>
> Hi, Karsten.
...
> Regarding the study in your other mails… the error seems to occur
internally, in the pixel data reading stage which is performed by the irk
version of GDCM.
> We found many issues in GDCM 2.x which is provided with debian
bundled ITK version.
> Please, try to open the study with our compiled ginkgo cadx 3.7.0,
just to discard the problem is there.
...
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards.
> --
> Carlos Barrales Ruiz
> [email protected]
> [+34] 983 108 494
>
> MetaEmotion
> Edificio CTTA. Módulos 119-122.
>
>
> Paseo de Belén, nº9. E47011. Valladolid. Spain.
> www.metaemotion.com
But that won't help :-)
I would think Matthieu (sp?) knows more.
> It would make more sense to apply the patch to GDCM/ITK upstream if it
> is needed / helpful to display "a whole range of studies".
AFAIR ITK/GDCM upstream has been fairly reluctant to apply patches.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
