On gio, 24 nov 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > I mailed you guys now because I think that by that time, it is no longer > possible to consider doing anything for etch, and that changes like > discontinuing a branch of software in Debian take time. > > Anyway, thank you all for considering this, I'll now shut up, and let > the people who are doing all the work on zope decide about this.
Please, do not shut up.. I'm really interested in your arguments and I suppose others too. As far as I'm concerned, the main zope products already depend on zope2.8 | zope2.7 (and I'm thinking about plone and cps), so removing the latter one shouldn't be too hard. I completely agree that we'll have to remove zope2.7, but I would prefer to leave it around untill the removal is really needed, mainly because there are a lot of people out using zope2.7 within testing (or even unstable) because zope products life-cycle is faster than debian stable's one. Plone will not depend anymore on zope2.7 in a near future (with the next release, the development team will start using Five, which is shipped with zope2.8 only), and I think that could be the right moment to drop zope2.7 support. Other opinions? Thanks for your suggestion, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Studio Tranchitella Assoc. Professionale http://www.tranchitella.it _____________________________________________________________________ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature