Bug#330894: Isn't this fixed in the unstable version of inkscape?

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 02:03:06 -0800 

Hi!

You wrote two times in the changelog that this issue is resolved:

Changes: 
 inkscape (0.43-1) unstable; urgency=high

   * urgency=high since this version fixes the buffer overflow discovered by
     Joxean Koret (see CVE-2005-3737, debian bug 330894).

Changes: 
 inkscape (0.42.2+0.43pre1-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * Just for the record: inkscape version 0.42 and newer is not vulnerable to
     the security bug mentioned in Bug #321501.


So I'm wondering: why can't this bug be closed, with the appropriate version 
tag?
This would also help migrating inkscape into testing, which it cannot do till 
this bug remains open...

Thanks,

Guido

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to