Scribit Steve Langasek dies 25/11/2005 hora 00:56: > > According to the FHS, ``/usr is shareable, read-only data''. So FAI > > should not by default try to write anything in /usr and place it's > > nfsroot there. See #309554. > Could you elaborate on why you believe this is an FHS violation?
My /usr is only rw when doing dpkg operations. After having successfully installed the fai packaged, running the fai-setup -v fails because /usr is again ro. I think the fact that a user-triggered operation has to write in /usr is the point why there is FHS violation. > Is the fai nfsroot not shareable, or is it not read-only? (I would > expect an nfsroot image to be both...) It is not read-only, at least for the -k option of fai-setup, that install a new kernel in the nfsroot. So the nfsroot is clearly a read-write object the user can modify and update... It belongs either to /var or /srv (the latter I prefer, as it is clearly data for a service exposed by the system). Regards, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
