severity 339146 important retitle 339146 anjuta: please don't put shared libraries in the same binary package with your application thanks
This bug appears to be a false-positive; the anjuta package is not a library package. It contains some .so objects under /usr/lib/anjuta, but in unstable it provides no -dev package that anyone could use to link against these libraries. Given that there are consequently no reverse-dependencies, I don't believe a rename is required here. However, in experimental I see that there *is* an anjuta-dev package; but the libs are still in the main anjuta package, which is bad precisely because it's a problem for anyone trying to depend on these libs when they go through an ABI change. If we are to support packages linking against these libraries, the libs should be split into their own package (and for that matter, moved to /usr/lib). If their only use is for plugins or similar, though, then this probably isn't necessary after all. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
