On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 the mental interface of Rocco Rutte told: > Hi, > > * Elimar Riesebieter [05-11-24 20:48:26 +0100] wrote: > >On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 the mental interface of > >Gerhard Brauer told: > > >[...] > >>mutt-ng (and mutt) has a nice (patched?) feature to do a correct > >>List reply even the mailbox is not defined as "list" or subscribe > >>by looking at relevant header vars. > > >Wrong! Lists have to be defined in lists or subscribe.
Ahh, I see ;) Sorry for missunderstanding. > Nope. Grep for 'ist-Post' (yes, not 'List-Post' but 'ist-Post'.) > > >>On my backported mutt-ng on sarge there is a inconsistency when i > >>use the maildir header cache. As a example: > > >>I delete the header cache for debian-user-german mailbox. Then i > >>start mutt-ng, go to this mailbox. Pressing <L> does a correct > >>list reply to the list. When now switch to a other list (or close > >>muttng) and come back (and the header cache does it work) then > >>List reply (<L>) doesn't work anymore, it says (similar): Not a > >>mailing list. > > >Maybe 'cause the list isn't defined neither in lists nor in > >subscribe? > > No. The point is: the header caching doesn't seem to store the List-Post > header. Thus, when there's no header cache available, all headers are fetched > including List-Post:. When reading from cache where the header isn't > saved/restored, it looks like no List-Post: was there in the original > message. > Thus it fails. > > See the attached patch which works here like a charm (why shouldn't it ;-) Will check it. THX Rocco Elimar -- Obviously the human brain works like a computer. Since there are no stupid computers humans can't be stupid. There are just a few running with Windows or even CE ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
