On closer inspection, not quite; we can incorporate the fscanf pedantry - we probably should upstream that...
Cheers, Michael On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Michael van der Kolff < [email protected]> wrote: > AFAICT, upstream has incorporated those into pbmtojbg*.c & jbgtopbm*.c. > Additionally, I have tested the current version with -Wall, and it builds > clean. > > Cheers, > > > Michael > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Colin Watson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> > Current packager is working on uploading new upstream: 2.1. Hopefully >> > upstream did integrate most of your diffs, otherwise we'll just close >> > it. >> >> This implies that you will close this bug if upstream did not integrate >> all my diffs. Rather, if upstream did not integrate my diffs or the >> equivalent (e.g. casts so that the code is correct within C89), then >> please leave this bug open. >> >> -- >> Colin Watson [[email protected]] >> > >
