Hello! A very long time ago you opened a bug report at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505138
Some comments on the proposed patch inline..... Could you maybe answer the question about /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm below? > --- /tmp/hwclock.sh.orig 2008-11-08 14:57:29.000000000 -0800 > +++ /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh 2008-11-08 15:04:13.000000000 -0800 > @@ -122,6 +122,18 @@ > # WARNING: If you disable this, any changes to the system > # clock will not be carried across reboots. > # > + # Preserve an ACPI wakeup time > + # (see http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/ACPI_Wakeup) (Dead link, I guess we can just drop the above row.) > + if [ -f /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm ]; then > + ACPITIME_LOCATION="" Bug? should be set to the tested file above, right? > + elif [ -f /proc/acpi/alarm ]; then > + ACPITIME_LOCATION="/proc/acpi/alarm" > + else > + ACPITIME_LOCATION="" > + fi > + if [ "$ACPITIME_LOCATION" ]; then Isn't it better to include "-n" to test non-zero string? > + ACPITIME=$(cat $ACPITIME_LOCATION) > + fi > if [ "$HWCLOCKACCESS" != no ]; then > log_action_msg "Saving the system clock" > if [ "$GMT" = "-u" ]; then > @@ -130,6 +142,9 @@ > if /sbin/hwclock --systohc $GMT $HWCLOCKPARS $BADYEAR; then > verbose_log_action_msg "Hardware Clock updated to `date`" > fi > + if [ "$ACPITIME_LOCATION" ]; then Ditto, Isn't it better to include "-n" to test non-zero string? > + echo "$ACPITIME" > $ACPITIME_LOCATION > + fi > else > verbose_log_action_msg "Not saving System Clock" > fi Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
