tags 755439 + patch upstream thanks On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 at 10:17:09 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > The remaining failures seem to be an intentional behaviour change in PCRE. > I don't know whether the correct resolution is "adapt GLib" or "partially > revert the change in PCRE" so I'm assigning this bug to both for now.
I would really appreciate opinions from GLib maintainers on which solution to the DFA-matching thing is most correct, and whether the specific patches I sent upstream are OK. See <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733325#c14> (and please take any positive or negative feedback upstream). svn diff for Debian's glib2.0 packaging attached. These tests pass, but I get a failure in an unrelated test (opening another bug now). Thanks, S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
