On Sat, 2 Aug 2014 09:11:41 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Atsuhito Kohda <ko...@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>, 2014-08-02, 15:28: (snip) >>Sorry but I mean texmacs 1.99.1-1 (accepted one) and 1.99.1-2 >>(rejected one) in experimental. > > Oh, I didn't notice that there's a package in experimental. That was a > bit of information I was missing. > > Even the package from the archive triggers the Lintian error: > > $ lintian -F texmacs_1.99.1-1_amd64.deb > E: texmacs: embedded-library usr/lib/texmacs/TeXmacs/bin/texmacs.bin: > freetype > > (The package was accepted to the archive, because at that point > Lintian didn't have the check for freetype implemented yet.) > > To detect embedded copies of freetype, Lintian looks for the string > "FT_Get_CID_Is_Internally_CID_Keyed" in the binaries. But this is a > name of a public function, and texmacs just happens to use it. So it's > indeed a false positive. > > I'm not sure why exactly "FT_Get_CID_Is_Internally_CID_Keyed" was > chosen, and what would be a better string to use... Until we figure it > out, please add an override for the tag.
I see. Thanks for your clarification. Best regards, 2014-8-2(Sat) -- Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org