Hi, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit : > > Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series > > shipped with the respective release. > > Would it be worse to add such an entity? > > I'm actually surprised it wasn't there already.: > > > Is 3.14 kernel for Jessie correct? > > Recent mails said it'd rather be 3.16 > > > Index: en/appendix/files.xml > > =================================================================== > > --- en/appendix/files.xml (Revision 69218) > > +++ en/appendix/files.xml (Arbeitskopie) > > @@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ > > <para> > > > > A standard installation for the amd64 architecture, including all standard > > -packages and using the default 2.6 kernel, takes up &std-system-size;MB of > > disk space. > > +packages and using the default &linuxkernelseries-ver; kernel, takes up to > > +&std-system-size;MB of disk space. > > A minimal base installation, without the <quote>Standard system</quote> > > task selected, will take &base-system-size;MB. > > Well, I'm not sure it's actually useful to mention the kernel version > at all actually. Mentioning the precise version (3.16) seems really > pointless at least.
That's exactly why I asked above if it would be worse to add such an entity. Do we need that information? As it seems: no. Then there is no need to create that entity at all, right? Holger -- ============================================================ Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under the new D E B I A N L I N U X 7 . 0 W H E E Z Y ! Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/ ============================================================ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org