Am 14.08.2014 14:30, schrieb Paul Wise: > On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 14:15 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> fwiw, we are using "User: >> [email protected]" since a while now. > > Ah, there are still some bugs with the old user, sorry. BTW archived > bugs can now have their usertags altered so that could be fixed. > >> Hm, it seems dnsmasq requires dbus in any case, even when running under >> sysvinit or upstart. So I don't understand the alternative dependency >> you suggest. Afaics, dnsmasq should simply add a Depends on dbus? > > As far as I can tell, dnsmasq doesn't need dbus under sysvinit, not sure > about upstart though.
Hm, right. It seems so use --enable-dbus when being run under systemd. You've proposed: Depends: dbus | sysvinit-core | upstart But even with sysvinit-core installed, one can boot using the init=/bin/systemd command line. So maybe a simple: Recommend: dbus is better? I'm also inclined to just make systemd depend or at least recommend dbus, seeing [1] Michael [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758111 -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
