On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:28:34PM -0500, Tim Peeler said: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:45:45PM -0400, Tobias Hafner wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:47:37AM -0500, Tim Peeler wrote: > > > > > > Webcalendar depends on php4 (the meta package) wich depends on either > > > libapache-mod-php4 or libapache2-mod-php4. The apt suggestion is picking > > > the first dependancy. > > But I have libapache2-mod-suphp and it works... so the dependency > > must have a third choice. > > Right, but don't you think that's a php4 dependancy bug rather than a > webcalendar dependancy bug? I'll find out what my sponsor thinks, but I > believe that a bug should be filed against php4.
If libapache2-mod-suphp (an idea that makes me cringe) does provide all the functionality of the other php binaries, then php can depend on it. The suphp .debs do not appear to even provide a phpapi, so it is unclear to me if this is even the right course. Tim, I recommend reassigning this bug to php4. Just note that reassigns don't autogenerate an email to the maintainer, so it's considered polite to drop them an email letting them know what's going on. I am not convinved it's a bug in php4, either, as I don't know if the suphp provides the full php spec, but they'll know better than us, and if there is a packaging bug, it's in php4. Talk to you later, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.linuxforce.net | ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
