Hi, On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:45:12AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote: > > I don't think this is a particularly good measure since the blends are > relatively unknown.
I think it is not a measure for a sequence but rather a measure whether a Blend should be included or not. For instance I missed multimedia-tasks in my list (for the simple reason that I have not seen any relevant commit since nearly one year). But for sure multimedia is quite important for our users and perhaps the fact that there is a chance to prominently be shown in the installer might be a motivation for multimedia maintainers to review the tasks (both team members who previously commited to Git in CC). > >> $ curl -s 'http://popcon.debian.org/by_inst' | grep -e '-tasks ' > >> 10053 education-tasks 983 355 448 173 7 (Debian > >> Edu Developers) > >> 10929 science-tasks 830 76 660 58 36 (Debian > >> Science Team) > >> 11000 junior-tasks 818 0 0 0 818 (Debian > >> Junior) > >> 15895 plasma-widget-smooth-tasks 370 71 285 14 0 (Salvo > >> Rinaldi) > >> 17234 gis-tasks 305 0 0 0 305 (Debian > >> Gis Project) > >> 17279 med-tasks 304 26 250 11 17 (Debian > >> Med Packaging Team) > >> 21947 multimedia-tasks 166 0 0 0 166 (Debian > >> Multimedia Maintainers) > >> 32922 games-tasks 57 0 0 0 57 (Debian > >> Games Team) > >> 34392 debichem-tasks 50 0 0 0 50 > >> (Debichem Team) > >> 35076 ezgo-tasks 47 0 0 0 47 (Debain > >> Ezgo Packaging Team) > >> 41997 tine20-tasks 27 13 11 1 2 (Not in > >> sid) > >> 69244 site-tasks 5 0 0 0 5 (Not in > >> sid) > >> 93698 agenda-tasks 1 1 0 0 0 (Not in > >> sid) > > > > (column 3 is install count among active popcon users; descending order) > > It would also only rate Science, Edu, and Med (in that order) which might be > good top candidates anyway, but other blends have zero (0) installations > among active popcon users. So in any case, some ordering except popcon > install count is necessary. I'd consider alphabetic ordering as sensible enough. I would not (mis)use popcon stats as ordering criterion in this case. > I suppose questions regarding ordering can be: 1) What do we think Debian > users want to install? 2) Are there any blends in particular good shape? I think both criterions are not as objective as alphabetic order. Think of our language selection menu? Should we try to rank it according to the user base of a certain language or the translation status? I think this gets a clear "no". Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org