Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2014-09-05 14:13:42)
> Quoting Adam D. Barratt (2014-09-05 13:22:06)
> > Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
> > 
> > On 2014-09-05 11:52, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> Seems from <https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ghostscript> 
> >> and 
> >> <https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghostscript> 
> >> that binary package ghostscript-cups needs to explicitly be removed 
> >> from testing to allow new release (which has that package dropped) is 
> >> allowed to migrate to testing.
> >
> > No, it needs to be removed _from unstable_. Binary packages are not 
> > individually removed from testing other than as part of an automatic 
> > migration. (and in any case removal from testing wouldn't help, as the 
> > outdated packages would still be _in unstable_.)
> >
> >> ...and reportbug tells me you are the ones to task to about that.
> >
> > If your choice of suite were correct, sure. :-) As it's not, it's not.
> >
> > I'm re-assigning this to ftp.d.o rather than closing it, but to save 
> > people checking, the reason that the package isn't getting 
> > semi-autoremoved by the FTP team is:
> > 
> >      dak rm -m "[auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by ghostscript)" -s 
> > unstable -a 
> > amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc
> >  
> > -p -R -b ghostscript-cups
> >    - broken Depends:
> >      splix: printer-driver-splix
> 
> Thanks for the explanation.  I will file a severe bugreport against 
> printer-driver-splix.

No wait - I won't: I believe nothing's wrong with that dependency.

the package ghostscript-cups should be dropped, but a non-versioned 
dependency against it is fine as that is satisfied by cups-filters now 
providing that package.

So tell me again: Which package needs removal in unstable for 
ghostscript to be allowed into testing?!?


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature

Reply via email to