On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Joseph Herlant wrote: Hi Joseph,
just a few notes. > Indeed, I think that having only one backend by package might become > quite quickly a nightmare to maintain. > > So here is what I propose: > > - asciidoc-data (contains common tools, filters, lang files, backends > => data from /usr/share/asciidoc/, /etc/asciidoc/) -> No dependencies I would prefer -common as package name > > - asciidoc-minimal (contains python files => > /usr/share/asciidoc/asciidocapi.py, /usr/bin/*) -> Depends on python > and asciidoc-data and recommends libxml2-utils, xmlto (you're able to > generate man pages, xhtml using a2x and html files using asciidoc and > maybe others, have to test) => recommends less than 25M of > dependencies over the current 700M -base is probably better. > > - asciidoc-doc (basically containing data from > /usr/share/doc/asciidoc/*/ and man pages) -> Depends on asciidoc-data fine > > - asciidoc-dblatex (a meta package to get the dependencies required > for further document processing using dblatex) -> Depends on > asciidoc-minimal, docbook-utils, dblatex and suggests on epubcheck, > source-highlight fine > > - asciidoc-fop (a meta package to get the dependencies required for > further document processing using fop) -> Depends on asciidoc-minimal, > docbook-utils, fop and suggests on epubcheck, source-highlight fine > > - asciidoc would be a meta package installing asciidoc-data, > asciidoc-minimal, asciidoc-doc, asciidoc-dblatex and vim-asciidoc > (keeping the current style of the package for users not to be lost > after the upgrade) ack Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
