Package: libfreetype6
Version: 2.5.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #730742
Control: reopen -1

Dear Maintainer,

I also prefer Adobe rasterizer, to the point that my font packages,
namely fonts-tlwg-*, have switched from TTF to OTF due to the improved
quality it provides. The result was better control on glyph shapes
(because the fonts are developed using cubic splines) with smaller
installation size.

Switching back to the old engine causes regression on my fonts, especially
on terminal with dark background:

New engine: http://linux.thai.net/~thep/shots/20140923-tlwgtypo-new-engine-2.png
Old engine: http://linux.thai.net/~thep/shots/20140923-tlwgtypo-old-engine-2.png

New engine: http://linux.thai.net/~thep/shots/20140923-tlwgtypo-new-engine-1.png
Old engine: http://linux.thai.net/~thep/shots/20140923-tlwgtypo-old-engine-1.png

So, I agree with Jason Pleau that Adobe engine is preferred.

However, instead of providing alternative packages, I think the patch
should be reverted and the poorly-hinted Cantarell font be fixed instead,
as pointed out here in upstream mailing list (according to BubuXP's
comment #118 above):

  https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/freetype/2014-01/msg00011.html

I've checked Cantarell font, and its hints are really poor as described.

I'm reopening the bug, so the discussion can be continued.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=th_TH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=th_TH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libfreetype6 depends on:
ii  libc6              2.19-11
ii  libpng12-0         1.2.50-2
ii  multiarch-support  2.19-11
ii  zlib1g             1:1.2.8.dfsg-2

libfreetype6 recommends no packages.

libfreetype6 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to