Control: tag -1 - patch Hi,
Ondřej Surý wrote: > Your package cannot be transitioned automatically as it explicitly > build depends on specific API/ABI (libjpeg8-dev) To be more precise: It build-depends on "libjpeg8-dev | libjpeg-dev". > and this build dependency needs to be changed to libjpeg-dev. In > most if not all cases this should be sufficient to build against > libjpeg-turbo. Wasn't there something about libjpeg-nonturbo being dropped? Citing from [1]: "The release team does not want to have more than one libjpeg implementation." In that case a simple BinNMU suffices. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717076#235 > I am in process of testing each package in question to compile against > libjpeg-turbo and I will provide a suitable patch for each package > when I will succeed. You tagged that report "patch", but didn't provide one (yet). Removing the tag again accordingly for now. > On the other hand please note that the winter^Wfreeze is coming Indeed, the request comes quite late. > That also means that if you are OK with NMU [...] Nope. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
