Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2014, 09:09 +1100 schrieb Ben Finney: > On 31-Aug-2011, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > […] I pointed it out to them that it would be nice if the license > > could be included in the source repo itself: > > https://github.com/DavidKinder/Inform6/issues/1 > > That report was closed the following year, without any explanation. > > Could you re-start the discussion, preferably on that same upstream > bug report? If requests to get a clear grant of license are rejected, > we should at least have a clear rationale from the copyright holder > recorded at that bug report. > > (I neither have nor want a GitHub account). I think the explanation is https://github.com/DavidKinder/Inform6/commit/cb81f1045fcb445ae2d160c13979b61abec52b6f which is is probably good enough. (It could be better, e.g. a notice in each and every file... but hey, at leas something to work with) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
