Hi, atmel-adjusted headers are provided in the file avr8-headers-6.2.0.334.zip
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Simon John <g...@the-jedi.co.uk> wrote: > i'm not sure what the atmel adjustments are. from what i can see they > just package up the upstream avr-libc. > > if you look at the source from atmel, there doesn't appear to be any > patches, it just looks like upstream avr-libc: > > http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/Atmel-AVR-GNU-Toolchain/3.4.4/ > > i've CC'd the contact address quoted in the README to possibly clarify. > > regards. > > > On 08/10/14 13:21, Hakan Ardo wrote: >> Is it that so? Are all Atmel adjustments included in the 1.8.1? >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Simon John <g...@the-jedi.co.uk> wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> is there any update on this? Would it be possible to pull in the header? >>> >>> Why are we using the Atmel patches? Its going to be a long time before >>> we get avr-libc 1.8.1 that way. >>> >>> For a couple of years avr-libc upstream looked a bit dead so Atmel was >>> the only choice, but now I'd say upstream have overtaken Atmel again. >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> >>> On 23/09/14 07:19, Hakan Ardo wrote: >>>> Hi Simon, >>>> thanx for the report. I suppose we could pull in a single header file >>>> from avr-libc trunk if the general consensus is that the Atmel version >>>> is in a bad state. >>>> >>>> Aurelien, you been pushing for using the Atmel patches. Can you see >>>> any issues with this? Thanx. > > > -- > Simon John > https://github.com/sej7278 > g...@the-jedi.co.uk -- Håkan Ardö -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
