Hi,
On 09/10/2014 08:28, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Package: uthash-dev,libpoclu-dev
> Version: uthash-dev/1.9.7-1
> Version: libpoclu-dev/0.10-3
> Severity: serious
> User: trei...@debian.org
> Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Thank for the report. I think (I will check) that this is the same file.
I did not know that this header was already packaged. I will remove
it from libpoclu-dev and add a dependency.
Regards,
Vincent
> Date: 2014-10-09
> Architecture: amd64
> Distribution: sid
>
> Hi,
>
> automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
> same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
> detected the following problem:
>
>
> Selecting previously unselected package ocl-icd-libopencl1:amd64.
> (Reading database ... 10872 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to unpack .../ocl-icd-libopencl1_2.2.3-1_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking ocl-icd-libopencl1:amd64 (2.2.3-1) ...
> Selecting previously unselected package libpoclu1:amd64.
> Preparing to unpack .../libpoclu1_0.10-3_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking libpoclu1:amd64 (0.10-3) ...
> Selecting previously unselected package opencl-headers.
> Preparing to unpack .../opencl-headers_1.2-2014.04.13-1.1_all.deb ...
> Unpacking opencl-headers (1.2-2014.04.13-1.1) ...
> Selecting previously unselected package libpoclu-dev.
> Preparing to unpack .../libpoclu-dev_0.10-3_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking libpoclu-dev (0.10-3) ...
> Selecting previously unselected package uthash-dev.
> Preparing to unpack .../uthash-dev_1.9.7-1_all.deb ...
> Unpacking uthash-dev (1.9.7-1) ...
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /var/cache/apt/archives/uthash-dev_1.9.7-1_all.deb (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite '/usr/include/utlist.h', which is also in package
> libpoclu-dev 0.10-3
> Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-1) ...
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> /var/cache/apt/archives/uthash-dev_1.9.7-1_all.deb
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> cow-shell unlink .ilist: No such file or directory
>
>
> This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates
> sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would
> consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming
> or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the
> circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file
> diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a
> last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual
> Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and
> diversions should only be used when packages provide different
> implementations for the same functionality.
>
> Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
> (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
> slightly out of sync):
>
> /usr/include/utlist.h
>
> This bug has been filed against both packages. If you, the maintainers of
> the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
> resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may then
> also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug.
>
> -Ralf.
>
> PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors
> of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/.
>
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA vdanj...@debian.org
GPG key fingerprint: 621E 3509 654D D77C 43F5 CA4A F6AE F2AF D178 97FA
Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
