On Wed 08 Oct 2014 at 18:56:58 +0100, Brian Potkin wrote: > I never thought of trying an option which is aimed at showing service > status updates when booting. The suggestion works (with "quiet" scrubbed > from the kernel command line) but it would be nice to have the previous > behaviour. And why some status messages are shown is still a mystery. > > Please deal with this report as you see fit.
On reflection I've begun to have some doubts whether it is reasonable to have to trade-off a quiet boot for status messages in the journal after booting. It also means that with something like cups there are no log data shown for 'systemctl status' without systemd.show_status=1 and removing 'quiet'. It seems a lot to do to gain something which was there without effort in 208. Would there be any benefit to be gained in taking this issue upstream to systemd-devel? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
