On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 01:02:11PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Antonio Terceiro [2014-10-03 11:52 -0300]: > > autodep8 (waiting in NEW) already does this; we are still missing the > > counterpart in autopkgtest. I'm not sure if it is worth to adapt > > autopkgtest to also do that, to then when autodep8 gets in the archive > > change autopkgtest again to remove all heuristics and call autodep8 > > instead. > > That's what I want to do. I don't like having nontrivial logic like > autodep8 in two different places. Once autodep8 lands, I'll do the > bits in autopkgtest to use it.
It landed in unstable 2 days ago. :) -- Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
