-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Vincent Bernat wrote: > On the other hand, because the codebase is relatively small, it is > easy to maintain as is. As far as I know it can still fill its role > (but the 0.3 version doesn't have support for EC cryptography). > > The big question is: should it be removed now or should it be > removed in jessie+1?
Unless you have enough time to take over the upstream, it's probably best to remove stud before Jessie is frozen. The more you delay it the better chance of someone else creating dependencies on stud. https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQ89rwACgkQ/NU+nXTHMtFWvQCfXomB1cYH26EFywFDEOoL/o53 sHwAoJTb9P7tMa9Moc6kAxudMYq4cJc4 =uneN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
