On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 02:57:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Bill Allombert wrote: > > I am a bit confused by your report. I would expect what you request to be > > adequately provided by the popcon.debian.org website and the > > popularity-contest version field. We even provide separate data for stable. > > But not separate data for unstable+testing.
Indeed, but I am concerned that providing data for a small subset of the archive is a increasing the risk a deanonymization. Currently unstable+testing is about 15% of the archive but it is often much less. Furthermore if we publish data for unstable+testing, then data for old-stable and older can be computed by substraction, which is another subset that could be used for deanonymization. Add to that that processing an extra substet take quite a lot of time. > Also, there is no way to get a graph for a package limited to reports > for stable or unstable+testing. If by graph you means 'https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php', then it is not maintained by us. > Also, there is no graph of the total number of reporters who are using > a given release. "Statistics per popularity-contest releases" is almost > that, but not really. What is missing, specifically ? Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
