On Saturday 25. October 2014 15:02:46 Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Samstag, den 25.10.2014, 14:47 +0200 schrieb Gard Spreemann: > > Hi. I've newly subscribed to the list, and reported 766738. If there's > > anything I can do to help with resolving it, please let me know. > > sure. You mention that that ghc-mod 5.x has fixed it, and introduces new > dependencies. If you can identify those, and check that we can upgrade > them without having to upgrade too many unrelated packages, that would > be helpful.
I should have made this clearer, but I haven't actually checked yet. The changelog for 5.0.0 does, however, say "ghc-mod consumes much less memory than ghc-mod-4.1". I'll try to get it tested soon. > You can use the haskell-package-plan software to find that out: > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-haskell/package-plan.git;a=summary > > There is a README.md, I hope it is sufficient to get you started with > the tool. I haven't had time to do what you suggest in detail, but from a cursory manual look, I can see that ghc-mod 5.1.1.0 introduces these new dependencies (over 4.1.2): - async - data-default - djinn-ghc - ghc-paths - haskell-src-exts - monad-journal - pretty - split - text - transformers-base Of these, it seems to me at first glance that only djinn-ghc and monad-journal are not in Sid. The latter has no unpackaged dependencies, while the former needs djinn-lib. In summary, if I'm not missing anything, ghc-mod 5.1.1.0 would need to have djinn-ghc, djinn-lib and monad-journal packaged. -- Gard Spreemann <gspreem...@gmail.com> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org