+++ mateusz.ka...@gmail.com [2014-10-27 10:30 +0100]:
>    Package: g++-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf
>    Severity: grave
>    Justification: renders package unusable
> 
>    Dear Maintainer,
> 
>    I cannot install gnueabihf for armhf toolchain on amd64 platform.
> 
>    g++-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf : Depends: gcc-4.9-base (= 4.9.1-18) but
>    4.9.1-19 is to be installed
>                                   Depends: cpp-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf (>=
>    4.9.1-18) but it is not going to be installed
>                                   Depends: gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf (=
>    4.9.1-18) but it is not going to be installed
>                                   Depends: libstdc++-4.9-dev:armhf (=
>    4.9.1-18) but it is not going to be installed
>    E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> 
>    I believe this is because current gcc-4.9-base in Debian is 4.9.1-19 which
>    is in conflict with 4.9.1-18, and there is no existing package of
>    gcc-4.9-base-4.9.1-18 for amd64 architecture in any repository. Solution
>    would probably to update packages.

Yes, these packages need to be rebuilt against gcc 4.9.1-19. However the
gcc maintainer has disabled the behaviour that lets this package
build in -19. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766924

That can be patched around for now, but last night there was also a
new glibc building. Both have to be in sync on an arch before a
rebuild can occur. That should be in a better state by now, so I hope
to upload new toolchains today.

The close assocation with gcc means that (lib) dependencies have to be
exact version matches. Actually the gcc-4.9-base dependency (just
copyright/docs) version requirements could be relaxed, but as the
others stuff (built from the same version) have to be in sync anyway
this makes no practical difference.

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to