On Monday 10 November 2014 09:06:34 Russ wrote: > I'll try to take a look, but I no longer use Shibboleth and handed the > package maintenance off. Copying the general mailing list.
Sorry then, I CC'd you explicitly as you did the backport, with additional changes over the plain jessie package, and are still listed as an Uploader. On Monday 10 November 2014 13:38:35 Sam Hartman wrote: > I'd like to better understand the severity issue. > Are you saying that there's no order I can install shibboleth and apache > in wheezy that will work? > I.E. even if I manually install the module first? No, I suspect there clearly are ways to express the dependency and some install-order to satisfy it. I've raised the severity because this package's postinst fails due to a non- declared dependency. Additionally, this package is not providing the apache module and the daemon should not require apache2 to be installed at all. So IMHO the missing/hypothetical dependency is also incorrect. While I see the benefit of autoloading the apache module, I think that this package SHOULD NOT gain a hard-dependency on apache2+mod_shib2, but opt instead for a conditional a2enmod in postinst. As I said, I'm exploring a nginx+shibboleth path, which I expect to be supported by the split-packaging setup currently in backport. Just my 2c, though, as I'm still new to the shibboleth world. Cheers, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso) : :' : The Universal O.S. | lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 0x4F3BBEBF `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org