On 14.11.2014 12:46, Hilko Bengen wrote: > * Timo Aaltonen: > >> This sounds more like a dupe of #722665 where the fault is that >> libjackson-json-java never should've had the symlink called >> jackson-core-java... > > Which package should provide the versionless .jar file? > > Is the versionless .jar file needed at all? > > Was any of libjackson-json-java's reverse dependencies[1] broken when > the versionless .jar was removed from the package?
Not that I know of. > epubcheck seems to be fine because it has > /share/java/jackson-core-asl.jar, /usr/share/java/jackson-mapper-asl.jar > in its classpath. > > Would any of libjackson2-core-java's reverse dependencies[2] break if we > removed the versionless .jar from the package? At least mediathekview > would break. I think things should be left as they are, only proper > Breaks/Replaces as suggested by the submitter should be added. I will > upload a fixed package tonight. yes, B/R would be fine of course >> Renaming the versionless jar symlink in -core would break other >> software (dogtag-pki for instance). > > dogtag-pki is a curious case: pki-server depends on parts of both > Jackson 1.x and 2.x. Is this actually correct? should be, beats me why they use both. -- t -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
