Hello Stephen,
Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 02:23:21, Stephen Shirley a écrit :
> On 10 November 2014 14:49, Stéphane Aulery <saul...@free.fr> wrote:
> > Le lundi 10 novembre 2014 à 09:24:09, Herbert Xu a écrit :
> >> Stéphane Aulery <saul...@free.fr> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=501566
> >>
> >> I'm sorry but this patch looks wrong and the text looks correct
> >> to me as is.
> >
> > Ok. I passed the information but I'm not really able to judge its
> > pertinence. In this case I close this bug.
>
> So, i finally managed to figure out what the problem is. The wording
> is ambiguous (or maybe just insufficiently clear).
>
> "[n1]>&n2 Duplicate standard output (or n1) to n2."
Herbert rejected both corrections. Your new proposal is better but
incomplete. Stéphane Chazelas tried to complete it. Moreover you have
not made a new proposal for the first correction.
As I am not dash user, I do not have a good knowledge of the matter. Can
you complete your answer / choice, please?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Original version:
1) [n1]<&n2 Duplicate standard input (or n1) from file descriptor n2.
2) [n1]>&n2 Duplicate standard output (or n1) to n2.
Version on Debian bug tracker and refused by H. Xu:
1) [n1]<&n2 Duplicate standard input (or n1) to file descriptor n2.
2) [n1]>&n2 Duplicate standard output (or n1) from n2.
Second version of the patch refused by H. Xu:
2) [n1]>&n2 Redirect standard output (or n1) to n2.
Stéphane Chazelas proposals:
1a) [n1]>&n2 Redirect standard output (or fd n1) to the same "open
file description" as on fd n2.
1b) [n1]>&n2 Redirect standard output (or fd n1) to
the same resource as open on fd n2.
1c) [n1]>&n2 Copy fd n2 as stdout (or fd n1)
Regards,
--
Stéphane Aulery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
