Martin, I suspect this bug has been fixed due:
* Replace our Debian hwdb.bin location patch with what got committed
upstream. Run hwdb update with the new --usr option to keep current
behaviour.
Could you verify that ?
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 03:52:16AM +1100, kittyofthebox wrote:
> Package: udev
> Version: 215-5+b1
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Due to an incomplete debian patch udev rules are reloaded everytime an event
> occurs
> instead of only when udev rules change. After some dicussion in the
> #debian-systemd
> chat room this patch fixes the problem.
>
> Kitty
>
> -- Package-specific info:
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: jessie/sid
> APT prefers testing
> APT policy: (750, 'testing'), (700, 'testing'), (650, 'stable'), (600,
> 'stable'), (450, 'oldstable'), (400, 'oldstable'), (300, 'unstable'), (200,
> 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
> Versions of packages udev depends on:
> ii adduser 3.113+nmu3
> ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.53
> ii libacl1 2.2.52-2
> ii libblkid1 2.25.1-5
> ii libc6 2.19-11
> ii libkmod2 18-3
> ii libselinux1 2.3-2
> ii libudev1 215-5+b1
> ii lsb-base 4.1+Debian13
> ii procps 2:3.3.9-8
> ii util-linux 2.25.1-5
>
> udev recommends no packages.
>
> udev suggests no packages.
> --- a/src/libudev/libudev-hwdb.c
> +++ b/src/libudev/libudev-hwdb.c
> @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ bool udev_hwdb_validate(struct udev_hwdb *hwdb) {
> return false;
> if (!hwdb->f)
> return false;
> - if (stat("/etc/udev/hwdb.bin", &st) < 0)
> + if (stat(UDEVLIBEXECDIR "/hwdb.bin", &st) < 0)
> return true;
> if (timespec_load(&hwdb->st.st_mtim) != timespec_load(&st.st_mtim))
> return true;
--
Air pollution is really making us pay through the nose.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
