Control: tags 750521 + upstream Control: forwarded 750521 https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1777
Hi Rolf-- On 12/02/2014 12:26 PM, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Control: reassign -1 pinentry-gtk2 > > On 03.12.2014 01:14, Rolf Leggewie wrote: >>> yep, i think this report is specifically about something broken in the >>>> interaction between pinentry-gtk2 and scim. >> Yep, and it turns out to be a VERY old problem indeed (still reading up >> on it). It's from at least 2007 or most likely even 2006! >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel/14423 >> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330073 >> >> The people at Novell came to the conclusion that the problem needs to be >> fixed in upstream pinentry-gtk-2. > > After reading through the gnupg-devel mailing list over on gmane.org, > specifically > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel/14423/focus=14461 I > am reassigning this back to the pinentry package. That thread has some > indication that some work was done upstream but there is also an entry > from 2009 indicating the problem is still present and that mail never > received a response. Thanks for doing the background research for this and reporting it here. I agree with the reassignment to pinentry-gtk2, and i've forwarded the message to the upstream bugtracker. Regards, --dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
