Hi Adam, thanks for taking processing my request:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 21:57 +0100, Michael Hanke wrote: > > The previously unblocked (#771419) version 8.2.3~dfsg.1-4 that was > > intended to fix #769100 inadvertently introduced another (grave) bug > > in the default configuration (#772170). > [...] > > Except for the changelog and the reported patch the debdiff is identical > > to the one reported in (#771419). > > That doesn't appear to be the case: > > diff -Nru condor-8.2.3~dfsg.1/debian/rules condor-8.2.3~dfsg.1/debian/rules > --- condor-8.2.3~dfsg.1/debian/rules 2014-11-29 08:52:02.000000000 +0000 > +++ condor-8.2.3~dfsg.1/debian/rules 2014-12-05 19:23:32.000000000 +0000 > @@ -106,13 +106,6 @@ > chrpath -d debian/libclassad*/usr/lib/libclassad.so.*.* > # kill the default local config -- debconf will handle that > rm debian/htcondor/etc/condor/condor_config.local > - # modify condor config file with default Debian config > - # no default chatter to upstream > - echo "CONDOR_DEVELOPERS = NONE" >> > debian/htcondor/etc/condor/condor_config > - echo "CONDOR_DEVELOPERS_COLLECTOR = NONE" >> > debian/htcondor/etc/condor/condor_config > - # SSH template is a config file > - echo "SSH_TO_JOB_SSHD_CONFIG_TEMPLATE = > /etc/condor/condor_ssh_to_job_sshd_config_template" \ > - >> debian/htcondor/etc/condor/condor_config > I am not sure I understand. I think this change is accounted for in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;filename=spool_fix.patch;att=1;bug=772170 Functionally equivalent lines are now included in a patch for src/condor_examples/condor_config.generic.debian.patch The mixture of in-place modification at runtime and patches has proven to be unreliable. Hence to move towards putting as much as possible into patches. I am missing something? Thanks, Michael
