Mathieu, I got your other two bug reports (powerpc-utils) but not that one. The old address is dead, I've waited for some weak pretext to send out an update for pmud. You have just given me that pretext :-)
Truth to be told - I had not tested pmud on a system with recent devfsd/udev implementations. I need to look into why the legacy test for udev presence fails on modern systems. /dev/apm_bios is legacy (the whole pmud/powerpc-utils stuff is legacy, to be honest). But for all I can see, the package installation does not fail because of the failure to detect apm_bios or udev (that message is just a warning) but because the pmud init script is not correctly parsed by update-rc.d (because it lacks the correct LSB headers). This is what I need to fix, really. Cheers, Michael On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org> wrote: > Dear Michael, > > Sorry for the private email. I wanted to check that you are receiving > the bugs from pmud package, since it is still using your old email > adress: schm...@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de > > If you did receive pmud bug report, then please discard this email. > Otherwise I am interested in your comments for: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774632#5 > > Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
